Air Research Planning Committee (ARPC)

The ARPC is a technical committee that supports the AUPRF Program. The goal of ARPC is to help the industry expand its credible and relevant information to address knowledge gaps on high-priority methane and other emissions. They aim to initiate dependable research projects, both fundamental and applied, on existing and emerging environmental issues to support the development of new technologies and industry best practices. By doing so, ARPC supports the industry’s desire for shared research development and provides an opportunity to understand and manage these matters in a safe and effective manner.

ARPC Committee Members

Name Company Name
Andrea Zabloski Canadian Natural Resources Limited
Andrew Cattran NuVista Energy Ltd.
Carolyn Ussher Alberta Energy Regulator
Don McCrimmon Canadian Association of Petroleum Producers
Filiz Onder Pembina Pipeline Corporation
Gerald Palanca Alberta Energy Regulator
Graham Noble Government of Saskatchewan
Jacob Bayda Government of Saskatchewan
Koray Onder TC Energy
Marie Johnson Environment and Climate Change Canada
Peter Kos BC Ministry of Environment and Climate Change Strategy
Randy Dobko Alberta Environment and Protected Areas
Sean Hiebert Cenovus Energy
Sean Smith Environment and Climate Change Canada
Yaomin Jin BC Ministry of Energy, Mines and Low Carbon Innovation

Current Policy Issues and Knowledge Gaps

Public Policy Issue Knowledge Gap(s)
Methane Emissions

 Federal and provincial regulations require the oil and gas sector to reduce methane emissions by 45% by 2025 and the new proposed federal policy is to continue that duction to 75% by 2030. The industry is focused on meeting the reduction targets and timing in the most cost-effective way possible. Advancements in methane detection, quantification, and control technologies allow the sector to implement solutions promptly.

  • Best practice monitoring strategy
  • Risk-based approaches to mitigation
    • Damage cost estimates
    • Technical risk, financial risk
  • Methane reduction technology deployment
    • scale – closer linkage to the technology we are developing and then handing it off to IRAP.
  • Gas migration impacts on potable water.
    • water/conduit creating a connection.
  • Optimized methane monitoring and verification: There have been significant advancements in technologies to detect and quantify methane releases, including new OGI cameras, fixed and mobile ground sensors, crewed and uncrewed aerial sensors, and satellite sensors. The gap to close is determining a suite of technologies that will provide a high probability of cost-effectively detecting a methane flux in real-world conditions.
  • Improvements to the Methane Emissions Inventory, accuracy, and precision: Having an accurate inventory of methane emissions by source will ensure industry and regulators are focused on the areas with the greatest reduction potential. Projects could tar- get ongoing disagreements with top-down vs. bottom-up measurements and test whether poorly defined sources, such as emissions from inactive facilities, meaningfully contribute to the emissions in inventory.
    • Improved Engineering estimates for baseline ac- curacy. Standardized equipment emissions pro-files for major pieces of equipment.
    • Reconciliation of top-down and bottom-up data and analytical frameworks
  • Understanding Routine and non-routine Venting from Tanks: Efforts to establish an accurate methane emission inventory have identified tank venting as contributing to methane emissions at oil production and processing facilities. In addition, anecdotal information suggests that large, abnormal, episodic events can be a significant contributor to a facility’s emissions, but because of their nature, are difficult to detect and quantify.
  • Evaluating Methane Control and Measurement Technologies: It is important to evaluate near-commercial technologies with different operators, in different operating conditions and different facility types, and document the capabilities and limitations of each technology transparently so that all operators can determine the applicability of each technology in their unique asset mix.
  • Incomplete Combustion of Methane – Methane Slip: The industry is observing methane slippage in various technologies. How can methane slip be minimized using technology or process solutions while still meeting other regulatory emission requirements?
    • Reciprocating Engines
    • Boilers
    • Heaters
    • Flares (lit and unlit)
    • Assessment of Flare emissions and mitigation
      • Flare systems, PM, black carbon, NOx, VOCs, methane, flame out, combustion efficiency, and percentage impact from industry.
    • VRUs
    • Use of non-selective catalysts
  • Virtual Elimination of emissions: Are there options to consider for the virtual elimination of methane emissions on oil and gas sites? What is the role of planning frameworks such as the Peace River Directive to be applied to other areas? What sort of infrastructure solutions would be needed to enable this aspirational goal? What barriers and opportunities exist to deliver on this aspirational goal?
Air Quality Indicators

Ambient air quality objectives are continuously being reviewed and updated, and in- industry is being required to meet more stringent targets. To determine the impact of such policy changes, the industry needs to understand the contribution that upstream oil and gas facilities have to the substances being reviewed.

  • MSAPR Regulations
    • Phase 2 of MSAPR regulations and NOx.
  • An accurate understanding of the potential release of substances subject to new or revised air quality objectives from the UOG industry is required. Additionally, if the substance is being released in quantities that may be subject to regulatory requirements, reasonable and cost-effective emission control options would need to be developed.
Air Emission Inventories

Air emissions inventories are becoming an increasingly important method of monitoring and reporting on industry emissions, for the public, governments, and individual companies. Further, governments are using these emissions inventories to negotiate international treaties, establish air emissions policy measures and targets, and develop emission forecasts. As such, it is important that upstream oil and gas operators report facility emissions using standardized methodologies and realistic emission factors with low uncertainty, and also have access to a wide variety of effective emissions monitoring technologies. Inaccurate and/or overly conservative emissions factors can result in an inaccurate portrayal of the emissions profile of the oil and gas industry. This in turn can lead to unnecessary or ineffective regulatory requirements and additional public scrutiny.

  • The development of technically defensible and effective emission management policies and regulations is reliant upon good quality emissions data to both identify potential opportunities for emission ductions and to determine industry performance and emissions reductions in future years. There are opportunities to address this knowledge gap by investigating potential improvements to the certainty of quantification (emission factors and measurement technologies and methodologies), monitoring, data management, and reporting of emissions from the upstream oil and gas sector.
  • Collaboration and coordination as we develop a tool to better understand the Alberta NOx inventory/baseline (using recently collected MSAPR test data), and development of a model that will reveal practical, strategic, and cost-effective options for our sector to achieve AAQOs/CAAQS objectives. Identify other emerging issues among other air contaminants.
    • CO2 sensors. Standards and accuracy
    • VOC inventories and mitigation
    • Tools needed for ambient testing permanently
Data Analysis

There is an ever-growing amount of data generated by oil and gas companies and various repositories collecting data. It would be useful to analyze the data into meaningful insights that will help the industry address ongoing challenges.

  • Data Utilization Strategy
    • Data analysis aimed at informing and helping the industry to make better, smarter, cost-effective decisions.