Erin Bayne, Lionel Leston, and Hedwig Lankau, Department of Biological Sciences, University of Alberta
C. Lisa Mahon, Craig Machtans, Steven L. Van Wilgenburg, and Samantha J. Song, Canadian Wildlife Service, Environment Canada
Péter Sólymos, Department of Biological Sciences, University of Alberta, and Alberta Biodiversity Monitoring Institute
Jeffrey R. Ball, Canadian Wildlife Service, Environment Canada, and Ducks Unlimited Canada
Steve G. Cumming, Université Laval
Trish Fontaine, Boreal Avian Modelling Project, University of Alberta
Fiona K. A. Schmiegelow, Department of Renewable Resources, University of Alberta
April 21, 2016
Abstract
Responses of boreal birds to changes in forest structure and composition caused by construction of well pads, seismic lines, and pipelines are poorly understood. Bird species associated with older forests are predicted to experience larger population declines with increased disturbance compared with species associated with younger or open habitats; however, point count methods may influence apparent outcomes because the proportional area of disturbed vegetation and the magnitude, uncertainty, and detection of a disturbance response by birds vary as a function of sampling area. We analyzed point count data from 12 energy sector studies and measured how disturbance type and point count radius interacted to affect 531 impact ratios (mean abundance at point counts centered within disturbances relative to abundance at point counts within forest 150-400 m from the nearest edge bordering those disturbances [59 species*3 disturbance types*3 point count radii]). We observed larger disturbance effects (impact ratios) within larger-radius point counts at well pads (100-m and unlimited-distance) and pipelines (unlimited-distance) compared with 50-m point counts at seismic lines, and within 50-m point counts at well pads relative to 50-m point counts at seismic lines. Effect uncertainty was higher at well pads and pipelines than seismic lines, and lower within larger-radius point counts. The probability of detecting a disturbance response was greater for larger-radius point counts at pipelines than for 50-m point counts at seismic lines, and within 50-m point counts at well pads relative to 50-m point counts at seismic lines. On average, a species was more likely to increase in abundance near an energy sector disturbance if the species was not associated with older (>75 yr) forest stages. While the effects of disturbance varied by species and with disturbance type, the effects of pipelines and seismic lines were better detected by larger- radius point counts, while the effects of well pads were better detected by smaller-radius point counts.
Keywords: Boreal Avian Modelling Project, seismic line, well pad, pipeline, bird, boreal forest, anthropogenic impacts, habitat alteration
# 16-ERPC-08D